|
Documents
|
|
88-0167.doc
|
activities.
Dortch explained that his video surveillance of October 8, 1986, showed the employee, with her
|
|
88-0265.doc
|
, camera ready art for print production or creative video for entertainment, training or commercial TV
|
|
88-0305.doc
|
on the testimony and video tape provided by Paul Munoz who observed the employee fishing calf-deep in a stream
|
|
88-0307.doc
|
companion, laundry folder, sewing machine operator and surveillance svstem monitor. Mr. Skilling testified
|
|
88-0318.doc
|
requiring defendants to release a surveillance videotape in Juneau, Alaska. Employee is represented
|
|
88-0373.doc
|
|
|
89-0036.doc
|
activities while under surveillance in Denver, Colorado. She and a fellow investigator performed 50 hours
|
|
89-0079.doc
|
the employer and insurer to release video surveillance tapes and those portions of an investigator's report
|
|
89-0101.doc
|
. The hearing commenced on 2 March 1989 but was continued to allow Employee to view surveillance video tapes
|
|
89-0110.doc
|
and Fire Alarm Monitor with ADT Company in Seattle with direct experience as a Surveillance System Monitor
|
|
89-0124.doc
|
. From approximately December 1980 to September 1981 Employee worked 14 hours a day at a video arcade
|
|
89-0162.doc
|
on his examination of the employee, reviewing the B-200 results and looking at the video taken in April
|
|
89-0172.doc
|
Respondents to release surveillance videotapes and an investigator's report.
Employee, who lives in Sisters
|
|
89-0194.doc
|
and the proceedings are video-taped.
3. Does the suspension of benefits in this case warrant a referral
|
|
89-0272.doc
|
. Neal Kaplowitz video-taped deposition on October 10, 1989 in Fairbanks, Alaska on the basis
|
|
89-0280.doc
|
by a court reporter with video recording apparatus. Dr. James declined to proceed with the scheduled
|
|
89-0289.doc
|
evaluations upon the presence of video recording equipment and his attorney or a court reporter
|
|
89-0318.doc
|
or an employer's employment costs records or surveillance videos, to all parties, and so that informed decision can
|
|
90-0032.doc
|
expenses. Medical expenses have been paid in the amount of $12,941.23.
SURVEILLANCE OF EMPLOYEE
|
|
90-0050.doc
|
and to identify his daily activities. Davis stated that he had the employee under surveillance and took video
|
|
90-0063.doc
|
also submitted pictures and video tapes which he said showed Meza dancing and walking. We reviewed
|
|
90-0085.doc
|
the police video subsequently taken shows that other than the living and dining room area, the remaining
|
|
90-0142.doc
|
responsibilities which included review of her work activities as depicted in a video tape which was introduced
|
|
90-0145.doc
|
telephonically or a video deposition could be taken which would avoid the need for him to travel. We do not find
|
|
90-0170.doc
|
. Both believed she could return to some type of work. Dr. Horning approved work as a video tape rental
|
|
90-0226.doc
|
and "slight counterclockwise rotation."
• Those surveillance videotapes were available to us at the time
|
|
90-0249.doc
|
surveillance tapes for the insurer. Sullivan also presented a tape he took of various types of heavy equipment
|
|
90-0286.doc
|
and 6/7/90).
At the hearing, the employer introduced a video tape taken by Thomas Hibpshman, a private
|
|
90-0293.doc
|
if the case were heard. If Defendants had other documents, such as surveillance reports or witnesses
|
|
90-0298.doc
|
paying video, deposition, and "cost" bills. We believe those services are properly considered part
|
|
91-0098.doc
|
, and to resolve a dispute about the release of surveillance videotapes. Employee is represented by attorney Paul
|
|
91-0180.doc
|
the employee was physically capable of working as a video store clerk or a laundry classifier-receptionist
|
|
91-0239.doc
|
. Newman and said he got no pain relief. Dr. Newman showed Employee an "ACF" video, and he diagnosed
|
|
91-0320.doc
|
reemployment plan to return the employee to work as a video tape recording engineer, combining 16 weeks
|
|
91-0327.doc
|
compensation.
Petitioners undertook surveillance of Employee and subsequently sought modification of our
|
|
91-0340.doc
|
whether to require the employee to attend a video deposition requested by Baugh Construction, and whether
|
|
92-0100.doc
|
she had seen similar videos before, and because of "family problems." (Progress note, 31 January 1992
|
|
92-0182.doc
|
testified that a video tape taken of her working in April 1991 did not accurately show all of her job
|
|
92-0220.doc
|
held a hearing regarding Baugh Constructions's petition to require the employee to attend a video
|
|
92-0254.doc
|
that work as a video store clerk and laundry classifier was available and that the employee was qualified
|
|
92-0287.doc
|
would be done at home with video tapes and a computer. Deisher stated that after the formal training
|
|
92-0325.doc
|
in retail sales, as a video rental clerk, as an inserter-collator, or in telemarketing. She
also found
|
|
93-0002.doc
|
hours of surveillance video tapes. At hearing we were shown short composite videotapes prepared by both
|
|
93-0035.doc
|
and order regarding the merits of his claim?
2. Is the employer entitled to discover a video made
|
|
93-0106.doc
|
obtained copies of the surveillance videotape and other related documents from the third-party. Absent
|
|
93-0111.doc
|
also viewed a video tape of unknown length. He charged $1,100.00 for the IME.
In response to our
|
|
93-0117.doc
|
, permanent
Sales Person,
Sporting Goods
$5.50 per hour, permanent
Video Clerk
$5.00 per hour
|
|
93-0129.doc
|
of fluid in the joint.
On January 6, 1989, Dr. Morgan met with Kirkpatrick-Stoltze to discuss a video
|
|
93-0169.doc
|
. In his chart notes, he stated in part:
I also showed her the ALIF video and talked to her a little bit
|
|
93-0176.doc
|
observations, the video tapes and a large package of photographs taken during his surveillance of the employee
|
|
93-0193.doc
|
Report, 8 October 1992.) Surveillance reports indicate Employee began working in a family business
|
|
93-0200.doc
|
in his low-back, buttocks, and thigh which he associated with working long hours seated at a video
|
|
93-0209.doc
|
12, 1993), we ruled on whether the employee was entitled to "interim" compensation, whether a video
|
|
93-0231.doc
|
p.m. until 2:44 p.m. Employee left his property at 2:46 p.m., and the surveillance ceased.
During
|
|
93-0298.doc
|
to interim compensation; 2) whether the video referred to during the October 21, 1992 hearing
|
|
94-0168.doc
|
under surveillance by a private investigator. The video tape recording of the employee's activities
|
|
94-0222.doc
|
attendance at an EME with a video camera was not permissible. Specifically, the Board held at 10:
"We find
|
|
94-0275.doc
|
, and a video production business. Neither new venture proved to be successful. (Nancy Guiley Dep. at 8
|
|
94-0280.doc
|
come in?
A. Yes, yes.
The surveillance video tape presented for our review displayed a relatively
|
|
95-0072.doc
|
,
)
Respondents.
)
)
This request for discovery of surveillance material was heard at Fairbanks, Alaska
|
|
95-0118.doc
|
and surveillance was undertaken regarding this claim. [Petitioners] do not wish to release this information
|
|
95-0122.doc
|
includes Employee's deposition, taken 2 February 1995 and a video tape, which is about five minutes long
|
|
95-0216.doc
|
unable to obtain needed documents and a video tape from the United States government. (4) Defendants
|
|
95-0239.doc
|
showed a video of the work site. The video demonstrated that the operators took calls, and used a key
|
|
95-0310.doc
|
an SIME?
3. Should the SIME consider surveillance videos in performing the evaluation?
SUMMARY
|
|
96-0007.doc
|
he was assigned to conduct surveillance of Employee's activities. Mr. Willott eventually found
|
|
96-0024.doc
|
film studies or videos which have been done and which films the employee will hand carry to the SIME
|
|
96-0208.doc
|
. At the conclusion of the hearing, the parties requested we view portions of video tape. We closed the record on May
|
|
96-0383.doc
|
symptomatic, and "Sales Attendant (in the video/photo department) is the alternative position offered
|
|
96-0392.doc
|
as a video tape clerk.
At the employer's request the employee was examined on January 5, 1996 by orthopedic
|
|
96-0459.doc
|
as documented in this report, her normal brain scan, her normal EEG and video monitoring, and her normal neuro
|
|
97-0014.doc
|
washer for years.
•Dr. Hadley also reviewed a video tape which allegedly shows the employee
|
|
97-0152.doc
|
for repetitive motion injuries, we have a video available on the subject, and we have printed materials as well
|
|
97-0179.doc
|
with a limp which was evident on the video.
At the November 1992 hearing, Gary Fisher, a rehabilitation
|
|
97-0182.doc
|
to in the VAX-D promotional video.
Dr. Horning testified that decompression can be accomplished by surgery
|
|
97-0193.doc
|
prior to the employer's production of a surveillance video in which it had monitored the employee
|
|
98-0024.doc
|
closed on January 14, 1998 after we watched the video.
ISSUES
1. Are Employee's right and left hip
|
|
98-0120.doc
|
as long as Willott testified, and that he walks with a limp which was evident on the video
|
|
98-0189.doc
|
decided to hire a private investigator to provide video surveillance of the employee on May 14, 1997
|
|
98-0251.doc
|
|
|
98-0253.doc
|
, about 11 months of video home study and 10.8 months of on-the-job training. The plan required
|
|
98-0300.doc
|
Ickes testified by video deposition taken September 10, 1998. Ickes who currently works for Alaska
|
|
99-0003.doc
|
recording, but generally audible. The video image is not always adequately clear to determine fine features
|
|
99-0006.doc
|
difficulty reading or watching videos.
Peggy Johnson, Employee's sister, testified by telephone
|
|
99-0036.doc
|
to allow the employee an opportunity to respond to the surveillance video. Mr. Jensen withdrew his
|
|
99-0045.doc
|
testified 24 hour video EEG monitoring in a university setting would be appropriate. (Id. at 33
|
|
99-0106.doc
|
.
In his February 19, 1999 video deposition, Dr. Joosse stated he first saw the employee in October of 1980
|
|
99-0113.doc
|
on a surveillance video and medical testimony the claimant was malingering. The Board supplied the Division's
|
|
99-0148.doc
|
is corroborated by the testimony of and video taken by Mr. Sides who observed the employee shortly before
|
|
99-0155.doc
|
or to make specific informal discovery requests for factually oriented documents,
such as surveillance
|
|
99-0176.doc
|
April 11 through April 14, 1999, Employer, through video surveillance, recorded Employee's physical
|
|
99-0202.DOC
|
person impairment. (Id.).
Employer conducted a video taped surveillance investigation of Employee’s
|
|
99-0220.doc
|
|
|
99-0234.doc
|
and that the activity checks on, or surveillance of, the employee were standard and done to provide continuing evidence
|
|
99-0241.doc
|
of the video-taping of the hearing. In Flock I at page 28 and 29 we found:
We are required to give each
|
|
01-0032.doc
|
practice. After his rehabilitation, the employee returned to work in April, 1988 as a Surveillance
|
|
01-0062.doc
|
and spurring of the facets.
12/93 to 4/94 It is reported there was video surveillance which showed Broderick
|
|
01-0063.doc
|
to a position outside of the front office area where the employee worked. She also requested that a video
|
|
01-0132.doc
|
) at Anchorage, Alaska on May 16, 2001. We also heard the employer’s request to submit surveillance videotapes
|
|
01-0153.doc
|
disorders of balance systems. Dr. Zivin also reviewed surveillance videotapes dated August 25, 2000. Dr
|
